NetbookTech

Your source for Netbook/Mini-Notebook News and Info

Gateway LT3103u Review

Comments

Introduction:

281With vendor after vendor rapidly hurling fastballs at us in the form of new netbook systems, the new Gateway LT3103u is best seen as a bit of a changeup. Unlike its netbook-brethren, the LT3103u keeps Intel on the outside by opting for an AMD platform in the form of the AMD Athlon 64 L110 processor and an ATI Radeon X1270 GPU. But wait – that’s not the only change of pace the LT3103u introduces. Expect the usual 1GB of RAM and 160GB hard drive? Nota chance. How about 2GB of RAM standard and a nice spacious 250GB hard drive instead? But why stop there? Forget the nearly standard 10.1 inch, 1024 x 600 resolution display. Gateway moves it up a notch by using a 11.6 inch, 1366 x 768 resolution display. Yes, the LT3103u is certainly a change of pace from the netbook norm but what isn’t different is the price. The $399 price tag ensures the Gateway LT3103u stays competitive with the rest of the competition. But how exactly does it perform against the rest of the Atom-based lot? What can you expect out of the ATI integrated graphics? Is this an alternative to the NVIDIA ION platform? Let’s find out.

Specifications:

First off, let’s review the system specs for the LT3103u.

  • AMD Athlon 64 L110 Single-Core Processor clocked at 1.2GHz. 800MHz Front Side Bus and 512KB L2 cache
  • Windows Vista Home Basic 32 bit with Service Pack 1
  • 2GB DDR 533MHz SDRAM Single Channel Memory
  • 250 GB SATA hard drive
  • 802.11 b/g Wi-Fi certified
  • AC adapter
  • 6 cell Lithium Ion – 5200 mAh battery
  • ATI Radeon X1270 graphics and AMD RS690E chipset
  • 3 USB 2.0 ports
  • VGA connector
  • 11.6 inch HD WXGA Ultrabright LED backlit display (1366 x 768 resolution with a 16:9 aspect ratio)
  • Multi-gesture touchpad
  • Multi-in-one Digital Media Card Reader with support for Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro, Multimedia Card, Secure Digital, and xD-Picture Card
  • 10/100 Ethernet
  • HD Audio Support, Built-in Speakers, microphone, headphone with Dolby Headphone Technology, Speaker, Line-out jack
  • “Nightsky black finish”
  • 0.3 megapixel integrated webcam
  • Measures 1.03 x 11.26 x 7.99 inches and weighs 3.04 lbs

If you’re not a fan of the black finish, Gateway also offers the LT3114u which is the same system except in a “Cherry Red finish”.

A Look Around:

Specs aside, let’s take a look at the Gateway LT3103u. We’ll start with the packaging:

 266

267

268

Open up the box and you’ll see the following:

269

The netbook is sheathed in a protective cover. Taking the netbook out, you’ll see the rest of the contents (with the power cord on the right).

270

Here’s what comes with the package on the inside:

271

272

Here’s the top of the netbook (Yes I know.. I left the plastic on. I’m just like that ok?):

273

And in case you’re wondering – yes the top cover of the LT3103u is indeed a fingerprint magnet. I lifted the plastic cover temporarily and got my fingerprint on it instantly.

The left side of the netbook:

276From right to left, there’s the Ethernet jack, the power connector, ventilation slots, and a USB 2.0 port.

The right side of the netbook:

275 From right to left – media card reader, audio jacks, two USB 2.0 ports, Kensington Lock, and a VGA connector.

The battery area:

Attach the somewhat large battery to the back of the netbook and this is what you get:

277

While the battery does jut out a bit from the back, it also provides a nice tilt to the netbook which translates to a more comfortable typing experience.

011

Keyboard:

Those of you used to 92 or 93% keyboards on 10.1 inch netbooks will certainly appreciate the full sized keyboard on the LT3103u. The larger system form factor made it easy for Gateway to include one on the netbook although it still had to make some compromises with the arrow keys on the lower right hand side. The keyboard itself is comfortable and responsive (and definitely not as mushy as other keyboards out there) and quite comparable to the keyboard on my 15 inch Sony VAIO VGN-NR385E notebook. You should have no problems using this keyboard for hours on end.

282

Touchpad:

012

Gateway adds in a multi-touch touchpad on the LT3103u which is not really covered here in this review (primarily because I’m not a multi-touch user at all except on my iPhone). However, if you are a multi-touch user, then you’ll certainly be happy with the large spacious touchpad. I did have to calibrate the touchpad sensitivity a bit since it wasn’t registering my finger swipes half the time.

A single button lines the bottom of the touchpad. It’s certainly adequate enough although the button travel distance is fairly short and you can barely hear or feel the button presses. I

Upgrades:

With 2GB of RAM and a 250GB hard drive standard on the LT3103u, there’s arguably very little reason to perform any upgrades on the netbook (unless you want to swap the hard drive for a solid state drive). Yet despite this, Gateway makes it very easy to access some of the upgradeable components.

Here’s a shot of the underside of the LT3103u. There are three access panels which can be removed simply by removing the screws.

274

The lower left hand side is the access panel for the mini PCI Express slot.

003

005

The upper left hand side is the access panel for the notebook hard drive.

001

002

Finally, the lower right hand side is the access panel for the single SO-DIMM slot (which is occupied by the 2GB SO-DIMM).

004

007

Bundled Software:

Out of the box, the LT3103u comes with Windows Vista Home Basic pre-installed. I’m certainly not a Vista hater but if you want to eek out a bit more performance you might want to consider installing Windows XP on the box (or try out Windows 7 RC).

006

With that said, Vista Home Basic is certainly fine for most everyday tasks thanks in no small part to the included 2GB of RAM. If you want a bit more responsiveness, you’ll want to consider tweaking your system – especially removing some of the pre-installed software (or what I like to consider “crapware”). 

Some of the bundled “crapware” includes:

  • Microsoft Works
  • 60 day trial version of Microsoft Office
  • 60 day trial version of Nortion Internet Security 2009
  • Microsoft Money Essentials

But there’s certainly more (as seen in this partial program list snapshot)

program list1

AND for those of you curious what the Windows Experience Index is under Windows Vista Home Basic, here it is:

windows experience index 

System Recovery and Restore:

Just like other netbook vendors, Gateway doen’t package any recovery DVDs with the LT3103u. It does provide a built-in Recovery Management Windows Application allowing you to create system recovery and application/driver DVD images. The catch? You’ll need an external USB DVD burner.

If you have a USB DVD burner lying around, you might want to consider creating these discs immediately – especially if you’re planning to replace the main operating system with something else.

Creating the recovery DVDs is straight-forward enough. Simply connect your burner, start up the application and follow the instructions. You’ll need two blank DVDs for the recovery DVDs and one blank DVD for the application/driver DVD.

Restoring the system image is just as easy. Simply place the first recovery DVD into your external DVD drive and then boot from the drive. The recovery DVD will load and then guide you through a restoration of the default shipped image. Here are some shots I took of the recovery screens:

001

002

004

005

Other OS options:

One nice side effect of having the AMD Athlon 64 L110 processor is the increased number of operating system options for the LT3103u. Yes this means you can install 64 bit operating systems on this netbook – OS’s like Vista 64 bit or Windows 7 RC 64 bit. It shouldn’t be hard to install Linux on this netbook either (although I’m not clear what the driver support is like as of yet).

I did successfully install both Windows XP 32 bit (see guide here) as well as 64 bit Windows 7 RC. The missing drivers for Windows 7 RC 64 bit came from the recovery application/driver DVD that I built via the Gateway Recovery Management application.

Benchmarks

OK.. so let’s get into the fun stuff. It’s benchmark time. I ran a limited set of benchmarks for the LT3103u – just enough to get a feel for how this system performs in comparison with an Atom-based netbook. Our reference Atom system is the first generation N270 based Acer Aspire One 8.9 inch model.

Boot Time:

Before jumping into the performance numbers, some of you were curious what the boot times of the LT3103u was. Under a clean install of Windows XP Professional, I was booting to the desktop within 35+ seconds. With the pre-install Windows Vista Home Basic, I was booting to the desktop in approximately 61+ seconds. This was significantly higher due to the number of pre-installed applications being loaded by the OS. A clean install of Vista should boot much more quickly.

Video Performance:

Moving on, there’s been several questions about the LT3103u video performance – especially when it comes to Flash video performance on sites like YouTube and Hulu. Unfortunately Flash video in the form of high definition video clips or full-screen standard video suffers from choppy playback on the LT3103u. While the ATI X1270 is a bit faster than Intel integrated graphics – it’s not THAT much faster.

YouTube and Hulu:

Here are some snapshots of CPU utilization during Adobe flash video playback.

For standard resolution Flash video files, the LT3103u was able to play back the video clips just fine on both YouTube and Hulu. This assumes you stay within browser window (tho you’ll notice the somewhat high CPU utilization).

youtube in browser cpu utilization

 hulu in browser utilization

Go to full-screen video or opt for HD resolutions and you’ll witness choppy playback as the CPU gets pegged at 100 percent.

Here is an HD YouTube clip (see the high CPU utilization on the right handside):

youtube in hd in browser

Here is Hulu right after it was playing in fullscreen mode (notice the spikes near the end of the Task Manager indicating the high CPU utilization)

hulu fullscreen CPU utilization

Other video formats:

What about other video formats?

It’s all about whether hardware acceleration is enabled or not. For example, I was able to playback 720p WMV video files fairly smoothly although CPU utilization was still somewhat high. This was possibly thanks to WMV hardware acceleration option within the Catalyst software application.

However, move to 720p MKV video clips using H.264 encoding and things get problematic as playback was choppy at best.

 entourage 720p mkv

Finally, standard resolution video files played just fine on the LT3103u.

The lesson learned? High resolution video clips will likely result in choppy playback and forget about HD Flash video playback.

Software Benchmarks

We ran a limited set of benchmarks – on both Windows XP Professional as the OS and under Windows Vista Home Basic as the OS. Keep in mind the Vista Home Basic numbers might be somewhat off due to the fact that the Vista OS wasn’t a clean install of the OS but rather the OS provided by Gateway which includes several pre-installed third party applications. The more processes you have running simultaneously, the more likely the negative impact against the benchmark scores. However, I kept these apps around simply because most of you will witness these apps and have to deal with it (just go ahead and uninstall some of these pre-installed apps!)

Again – the reference system is an Acer Aspire One 8.9 inch netbook with Windows XP Home, an Intel Atom N270 processor, 1GB of RAM, 160GB HDD, and Wi-Fi.

SiSoftware Sandra:

(http://www.sisoftware.net/)

Processor Arithmetic:

Higher numbers are better. No real clear winner here.

image

Processor Multimedia:

Higher numbers are better here. The Atom system wins on the first two benchmarks while losing ever so slightly on the third benchmark.

image 

Cryptography:

Higher values are better here. It’s pretty much a tie here.

image 

File Systems:

Higher drive index values are better while lower random access times are better. Here the included Gateway hard drive is clearly better performing than the Acer Aspire One hard drive.

image

Memory Bandwidth:

Higher values are better here. Somewhat of a dead heat although the LT3103u wins ever so slightly.

image

Memory Latency:

Lower values are better for the memory latency here.

image 

FutureMark PC Mark 2005:

(http://www.futuremark.com/download/pcmark05/)

image

PC Mark 2005 provides a system level score by testing the major components of the computer system. Each component gets a score and then a system level score is provided. The Gateway LT3103u wins every component score except for the memory component. It especially trounces the Aspire One on the HDD score – confirming what we saw with Sandra File System. However, overall, you won’t see much of a difference between the LT3103u and an Atom-based system (unless you have an ION platform with that Atom).

FutureMark 3D Mark 2006:

(http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmark06/download/)

image

On the graphics front, the ATI Radeon X1270 does outperform Intel integrated graphics but that’s not saying a whole lot here.

Cinebench R10:

(http://www.maxon.net/downloads/downloads/cinebench.html)

image

Cinebench R10 does show interesting numbers for the LT3103u – especially under Windows XP Professional. The single processor rendering scores are definitely higher for the LT3103u vs the Acer Aspire One. There are no xCPU scores for the LT3103u since the Athlon 64 L110 is a single core processor. However, you can see how hyper-threading on the Atom processor clearly helps performance under Cinebench R10.

So what can we say at the end of the day with these performance benchmarks? The Gateway LT3103u with the Athlon 64 L110 processor and ATI Radeon X1270 graphics isn’t exactly worse or dramatically better than an Atom-based netbook. If anything, the systems are somewhat comparable – although it ultimately depends on your application and quite honestly how many concurrent applications you’ll be running on your system. The one advantage with the Intel Atom processor is hyper-threading technology which can provide a nice performance boost for some multi-threaded applications (depending on how these apps are architected) as well as robustness to systems running several applications simultaneously.

Ultimately you really don’t win or lose from a pure raw performance standpoint with the LT3103u.

Battery Performance and Charging

To test battery performance, we ran Sandra’s burn-in software component continuously until the battery completely drained. I find this an interesting test simply because the Sandra burn-in application will peg the CPU at nearly a 100 percent a good portion of the time. I did lower the display brightness down to the lowest possible setting to mimic what one might do while disconnected from the outlet.

Using these metrics, we achieved approximately three hours of battery life from the six cell lithium-ion battery. Gateway rates the battery life to be around five hours –which of course depends on the usage scenario. Realistically, we predict the LT3103u’s battery to deliver somewhere in the range of four hours of power. In light of netbooks delivering 8+ hours of battery life, the 4-5 hour battery life is somewhat disappointing though not horrible by any means.

There was unfortunately another interesting disappointment. It takes a long time to fully charge the LT3103u battery. After fully discharging the battery, it took approximately 3 hours to charge the battery up to 43%. Extrapolating this outward, it’ll take approximately six hous to fully charge the battery – assuming we started with a dead battery. That’s a pretty darn long time if you ask me!

Summary

The Gateway LT3103u is certainly an interesting netbook to consider – especially if you’re looking for a larger display netbook for around $400 dollars. As mentioned in the introduction, the LT3103u provides features not commonly found on most other netbooks – standard 2GB of RAM; a spacious 250GB hard drive; a beautiful 11.6 inch 1366 x 768 resolution display; and of course a full sized keyboard which is an utter joy to use.

The AMD Athlon 64 L110 processor is somewhat comparable in performance to the Intel Atom N270 processor although the Atom processor has clear edges when it comes to Hyper-Threading technology and power-efficiency. What the Athlon 64 L110 provides is operating system options thanks to a 64 bit processor.  

On the graphics front, the ATI Radeon X1270 clearly beats out the Intel integrated graphics but don’t expect wonders here folks. Despite having a beautiful 720p supporting high definition display, you’ll be hard pressed to be able to actually view a 720p video clip on the LT3103u. With that said, it shouldn’t be difficult for you to view standard 480p video clips on the LT3103u – and let’s face it folk – we are talking about an 11.6 inch display here and not some 46 inch HDTV set. Do you really need HD video support? Yeah I didn’t really think so.

After all, it is a netbook we’re talking about here which means we need to make some compromises here right? (Maybe not when ION-based netbooks become readily available!)

Thus at $399, the LT3103u is one competitively priced netbook – especially when you consider competing netbooks in the same price range offer smaller displays, less RAM, smaller hard drives, and smaller keyboards. Yes battery life could certainly be better but you’re still getting a great value for a system a shade under $400 dollars.

Ultimately as with all computers out there, deciding whether something is right for you depends on your usage scenarios. If you’re OK with a standard Intel Atom-based netbook, chances are you’ll be perfectly happy with the Gateway LT3103u. If you’re computing enthusiast that loves the idea of running a 64 bit OS on the netbook, then yes, the LT3103u is right for you too.

However, if you’re looking for a netbook that’s capable of some 3D gaming and 720p video playback or you’re looking for super long battery life, then you’ll want to look elsewhere (ideally wait for those ION powered netbooks or just look at the Toshiba mini NB205 for super long battery life).

At the end of the day, there’s no denying the fact that the Gateway LT3103u is one admirable netbook worthy of nearly everyone’s consideration. A competitive netbook at a competitive price – a system you should definitely take a good look at. Just keep your expectations in line ok?

Pros:

  • Bright, beautiful, large 11.6 inch widescreen display
  • Full size keyboard
  • 64 bit processor
  • Breaks the mold for standard components – 2GB of RAM and 250GB hard drive
  • Stylish, compact, and fairly lightweight

Cons:

  • OK battery performance
  • Poor flash video performance
  • Long battery charging times

We hope you enjoyed this review! Please leave comments or questions!

Written by flung

July 10th, 2009 at 4:26 am

25,187 views

Viewing 84 Comments

 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Trackbacks

Related Posts